How to Think like a "Next Decade" Leader
by Alaina Love
My mother was an elegant woman
who never went out in public without looking very pulled together. Her hair was
always well-coiffed, her clothes properly tailored and suited for her petite
frame, and her youthful face was stark in its contrast to the date of birth
listed on her passport. “If you want to look good 10
years from now,” she said, “you’d better get started on that today.”
Many years later I realized
that my mother’s advice applies to both life and business. The most successful
leaders I know are dedicated to achieving results today, but have a keen eye
focused on what it will take to build an organization that thrives into the
next decade and beyond.
If you pick up any business
journal it’s hard to miss that fact that today’s business environment is ripe
with disruption in many industries. That phenomenon is demanding a paradigm shift in
leadership thinking, and your willingness to embrace it may well determine
whether your organization can sustain success into 2026 and all the years that
follow. This is the first in a series of articles that will explore the
evolution in leadership perspectives that can help your business not only
survive, but also thrive, in the disruptive decades ahead.
We’ll explore the balance
between traditional and evolutionary leadership perspectives as they relate to
processes, strategy, skills, contributions, execution and outcomes. At the same
time, we’ll focus on how those perspectives influence people, culture,
innovation and the passions that can be harnessed to achieve great results. It
is my hope that this series stimulates you to think about your own leadership
perspectives, about what’s working and what is not. I hope it challenges you to
question commonly held beliefs and sort through them to find those that will
support your business for the long term.
The paradigm shift that I’m talking about is more of a rebalancing of leadership perspectives about what makes an organization hum, and the people within it thrive while delivering results. This rebalancing is going to be increasingly relevant as we experience the influence of next generational expectations in the work environment.
Gallup’s CEO, Jim Clifton, recently spoke at a conference where he reflected on the growing percentage of millennials in the workforce. Clifton noted that this is a generation with high expectations that work should be a place where they feel a great sense of purpose, and jobs should be more than an economic means to an end. Yet, in our own research at Purpose Linked Consulting, we are seeing the same employee expectations expand across generational lines, and more demand from customers for personalization and humanization in the products and services companies provide. Everywhere, workers and customers alike, want more from their interactions with the organization. Those expectations suggest that an evolution in leadership thinking had better be underway if you hope to keep all generations and customers engaged, involved and excited about what your company has to offer.
The critical balance in
leadership thinking that will impact organizational effectiveness touches 10
major domains in mindset, as depicted in the following figure:
Let’s take a look at
systems/processes versus people/relationships to begin our journey. We’ll
explore the other domains in future articles.
When systems win
and people don't
In most organizations, there
is significant attention given to developing systems and processes that allow
the business to operate effectively. Those systems and processes span the range
of what an organization seeks to accomplish, from how it monitors product
output, to the way it gathers customer feedback, to the way employee
performance is evaluated and rewarded. Systems are essential for accomplishing
the work of an organization. After all, without them, we’d have chaos, correct?
While internal systems form
the framework for how a business operates, more problems are likely created by
a lack of focus on the people who are impacted by those systems, and the
relationships that are crucial to nurture so the systems can work effectively.
When that "people focus" is absent, it affects employees and
customers alike.
Here’s a case in point. I had
two interactions with large company systems just recently, in which I was a
customer trying to accomplish what I thought was a simple transaction. In the
first situation, I made travel arrangements for my son on a popular online
website. After carefully checking the reservations before submitting my
payment, I was satisfied that it was correct. Yet, my first hint of a problem
became apparent when I didn’t receive an itinerary via email, only a receipt
for my payment. I promptly called the company to inquire about the itinerary
and was assured that it would be in my inbox by the next day.
You already know where I’m
going with this story. Not only did the itinerary never show up, it took 12
calls to the company, with multiple transfers to different people in different
countries to finally discover that the company had put the air ticket in my
name instead of my son’s name. And the plot thickens. The “System” did not
empower anyone I was speaking with to actually fix the problem. They were
following the “Process” the company had outlined for them and I was the
unfortunate victim of it. Even the most dedicated employee trying to help
address my issue was frustratingly powerless to do anything about it.
Correcting this problem took
(I kid you not) 19 hours on the phone and several conversations with someone at
“headquarters”, after which I finally received a ticket for a flight that was
already fully booked. Is there any doubt in your mind that this
company has lost me as a customer -- forever?
In my second recent encounter
with the system versus people dilemma, I attempted to have funds wired from a
foreign bank to my domestic account. I followed my bank’s “System” providing
the foreign bank with the proper documents, along with very complicated wiring
instructions and account numbers. Despite this, the foreign bank finally sent
the funds. They were just never received. My domestic bank “thinks”
it returned the funds because the foreign bank had listed my last name followed
by my first on the account name field. Three dedicated domestic bank employees
have been trying for 10 days to track down my funds. They are in cyberspace
somewhere; so if you happen to find a rogue deposit in your account, please
give me a call.
The sad fact is that I suspect
my story is not unique. These are examples of failures in leadership thinking,
where so much emphasis is placed on following a process, or working within the
system, that the customer suffers, and so does the employee trying to service
the client. When employees are not empowered to make a difference, it’s not a
pleasant experience for either party.
This kind of thinking won’t
work in coming decades because this is an industry shape-shifting time. You
must ask yourself whether your brand of leadership thinking will allow your
business to be a significant player in your industry in 10 years. Or, will a
white-knuckled attachment to traditional leadership perspectives result in your
company’s growing irrelevance on the competitive landscape?
The outcome is yours to
determine.
Fuente: SmartBrief
Haciendo click en cada uno de los links siguientes, Contenidos de nuestros
TALLERES DE CAPACITACIÓN IN COMPANY, "A MEDIDA"
de las necesidades de su Organización:
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo incorporar y aplicar Modelos de PENSAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO en la Organización? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/pensamiento-estrategico-curso-taller-in.html
- Curso Taller de PLANEAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO - Recetas Eficientes para Escenarios Turbulentos 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/planeamiento-estrategico-curso-taller.html
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo Gerenciar Eficientemente a partir del MANAGEMENT ESTRATÉGICO? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/management-estrategico-curso-taller-in.html
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo GERENCIAR PROCESOS DE CAMBIO y no sufrir en el intento? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/gestion-del-cambio-2016-2017-curso.html
- Curso Taller de LIDERAZGO TRANSFORMACIONAL para la Toma de Decisiones 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/liderazgo-transformacional-2016-2017.html
Consultas al mail: medinacasabella@gmail.com
ó al TE: +5411.3532.0510
.·. Miguel Ángel MEDINA CASABELLA, MSM, MBA, SMHS .·.
Especialista en Management Estratégico, Gestión del Cambio e Inversiones
Representante de The George Washington University en Foros y Ferias de LatAm desde 2001
Representante de The George Washington University Medical Center para los Países de LatAm desde 1996
Ex Director Académico y Profesor de Gestión del Cambio del HSML Program para LatAm en GWU School of Medicine & Health Sciences (Washington DC)
CEO, MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
EMail: medinacasabella@gmail.com
TE Oficina: ( 0054) 11 - 3532 - 0510
TE Móvil (Local): ( 011 ) 15 - 4420 - 5103
TE Móvil (Int´l): ( 0054) 911 - 4420 - 5103
Skype: medinacasabella
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm ©
(medinacasabella@gmail.com; +5411-3532-0510)
es una Consultora Interdisciplinaria cuya Misión es proveer
soluciones integrales, eficientes y operativas en todas las áreas vinculadas a:
Estrategias Multiculturales y Transculturales, Organizacionales y Competitivas,
Management Estratégico,
Gestión del Cambio,
Marketing Estratégico,
Inversiones,
Gestión Educativa,
Capacitación
de Latino América (LatAm), para los Sectores:
a) Salud, Farma y Biotech,
b) Industria y Servicios,
c) Universidades y Centros de Capacitación,
d) Gobierno y ONGs.
No comments:
Post a Comment