Organizational Culture: the Secret of
U2's Success
by Michael Lee Stallard
U2 began as a rock band that people
booed and laughed at. Now, after receiving its 22nd Grammy Award in 2005, U2
has more than any band in history. It recently surpassed the Rolling Stones’s record for the highest
revenue grossing concert tour ever. Critics rave over the band’s music, and
fans worldwide can’t seem to get enough of its songs and concert appearances.
All the signs indicate that U2 is at the top of its game and will be going
strong for the foreseeable future. So how did this group rise to such lofty
heights, and what can we learn from its success?
The way U2 functions is even more
extraordinary than its music. The band’s four members — lyricist and lead
singer Bono, lead guitar player “the Edge,” bass guitar player Adam Clayton,
and drummer Larry Mullen Jr. –have known one another since they were teenagers
in Dublin, Ireland. Bono has described the band as more of an organism than an
organization, and several of its attributes contribute to this unique culture.
Members value continuous improvement to achieve their own potential, always
maintaining the view that they can become even better.
U2’s members share a vision of their
mission and values. You might expect a band’s mission to be achieving
commercial success as measured by number 1 hits and concert attendance.
However, U2’s mission is to improve the world through its music and influence.
Bono has described himself as a traveling salesman of ideas within songs, which
address themes the band members believe are important to promote, including
human rights, social justice, and matters of faith. Bono and his wife, Ali,
help the poor, particularly in Africa, through their philanthropy and the
organizations they’ve created.
U2’s members value one another as
people and don’t just think of one another as means to an end. Bono has said
that although he hears melodies in his head, he is unable to translate them
into written music. Considering himself a terrible guitar and keyboard player,
he relies on his fellow members to help him write the songs and praises them
for their talents, which are integral to U2’s success.
Bono has also had his band members’
backs during times of trial. When Larry lost his mom in a car accident a short
time after the band was formed, Bono was there to support him. Bono, who had
already lost his mother, understood Larry’s pain. When U2 was offered its first
recording contract on the condition that it replace Larry with a more
conventional drummer, Bono told the record company executive: There’s no deal
without Larry. When the Edge went through divorce, his bandmates were there to
support him. When Adam showed up to a concert so stoned he couldn’t perform,
the others could have thrown him overboard for letting them down. Instead, they
had someone step in to cover for him, and then went on to help Adam overcome
his drug and alcohol addiction.
Bono’s bandmates have his back too.
One of the most vivid examples of this came when U2 campaigned during the 1980s
for the observance of a Martin Luther King Jr. Day in the United States. Bono
received a death threat that warned him not to sing “Pride (In the Name of
Love),” a song about the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., at an upcoming concert.
The FBI considered it a credible threat. Bono described in an interview that as
he sang the song, he closed his eyes. When he opened his eyes again at the
end of a verse, he discovered that Adam was standing in front of him to shield
him from potential harm. Years later, when U2 was inducted into the Rock and
Roll Hall of Fame, Bono thanked Adam for being willing to take a bullet for
him.
Unlike many bands in which one
megastar gets most of the economic profits, U2 shares its profits equally among
the four band members and their long-time manager. This further shows the value
Bono has for his band members and manager. (We’re not saying that all
organizations should split the company’s economic profits equally; simply
recognize that when leaders take too much it works against engaging the people
they lead.)
Each member has a voice in
decisions, thanks to the band’s participatory, consensus-oriented
decision-making approach. If one person strongly opposes a particular action,
the band won’t do it, which encourages the flow of knowledge among band
members, allowing the best ideas to come to light. Their passion for excellence
is also reflected in relentless arguments over their music. Bono has stated
that this approach can be slow and frustrating at times, but the members of U2
believe it is necessary to achieve excellence.
These factors — which this book
calls shared identity, empathy, and understanding — create a culture of
connection, community, and unity among the members of U2. Bono has described
the band as a tight-knit family and community. Their commitment to support one
another extends beyond the four members of the band to a larger community that
includes their families, crew members, and collaborators — many of whom have
known each other for decades.
The secret of U2’s success is its
leadership and culture. Bono connects as a leader among equals because he
communicates an inspiring vision and lives it, he values people as individuals,
and he gives them a voice in decision making. It is this culture of vision, value,
and voice that has helped U2 achieve and sustain its superior performance.
This is a connection culture. In
examining how U2 operates we see the influence a connection culture can have on
the individual, as well as the group as a whole.
How about you?
An organization’s culture reflects
the predominant ways of thinking, behaving, and working. To appreciate the
importance of culture in the workplace, consider your own experiences. During
the course of your career, have you experienced times when you were eager to
get to work in the morning, you were so immersed in your work that the hours
flew by, and by the end of the day you didn’t want to stop working? What was it
about the job that made you feel that way?
How about the opposite? Have you
experienced times when you struggled to get to work in the morning, the hours
passed ever so slowly, and by the end of the day you were exhausted? Again,
what was it about the job that made you feel that way?
If you are like most people, you’ve
experienced those extremes during your career. I have too. As I reflected on my
experiences, I realized I hadn’t changed — the culture I was in was either
energizing or draining the life out of me. Thus I began a quest to identify the
elements of workplace cultures that help people and organizations thrive for
sustained periods of time. When the practices my team and I developed to boost
employee engagement contributed to doubling our business’s revenues during the
course of two and a half years, I knew I was on to something. A few years later
I left Wall Street to devote my full attention to understanding employee
engagement and culture so I could help others improve the cultures they were
in.
Three psychosocial cultures:
Connection, control, indifference
What type of culture are you in
right now? As we explore what it takes to establish and strengthen connection
cultures, it is instructive to understand how they differ from cultures of
control and cultures of indifference.
In cultures of control, people with
power, influence, and status rule over others. This culture creates an
environment where people fear to make mistakes and take risks. It is stifling —
killing innovation because people are afraid to speak up. Employees may feel
left out, micromanaged, unsafe, hyper-criticized, or helpless.
Cultures of indifference are
predominant today. In this type of culture, people are so busy chasing money,
power, and status that they fail to invest the time necessary to develop
healthy, supportive relationships. As a result, leaders don’t see value in the
relational nature of work, and many people struggle with loneliness. Employees
may feel like a cog in a machine, unimportant, uncertain, or invisible.
Both of these cultures sabotage
individual and organizational performance. Feeling consistently unsupported,
left out, or lonely takes a toll. Without the psychological resources to cope
with the normal stress of modern organizational life, employees may turn to
unhealthy attitudes and behaviors, many of which are addictive and destructive.
A distinguishing feature of these
cultures is a sole focus on task excellence. Leaders may openly dismiss the
need for relationship excellence. Others may give it lip service and occasional
attention, or see its value without knowing how to bring it about. In order to
achieve sustainable, superior performance, every member of an organization
needs to intentionally develop both task excellence and relationship
excellence. A connection culture produces relationship excellence.
In a connection culture people care
about others and care about their work because it benefits other human beings.
They invest the time to develop healthy relationships and reach out to help
others in need, rather than being indifferent to them. This bond helps overcome
the differences that historically divided people, creating a sense of
connection, community, and unity that is inclusive and energized, and spurs
productivity and innovation.
Fuente: SmartBrief
Haciendo click en cada uno de los links siguientes, Contenidos de nuestros
TALLERES DE CAPACITACIÓN IN COMPANY, "A MEDIDA"
de las necesidades de su Organización:
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo incorporar y aplicar Modelos de PENSAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO en la Organización? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/pensamiento-estrategico-curso-taller-in.html
- Curso Taller de PLANEAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO - Recetas Eficientes para Escenarios Turbulentos 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/planeamiento-estrategico-curso-taller.html
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo Gerenciar Eficientemente a partir del MANAGEMENT ESTRATÉGICO? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/management-estrategico-curso-taller-in.html
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo GERENCIAR PROCESOS DE CAMBIO y no sufrir en el intento? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/gestion-del-cambio-2016-2017-curso.html
- Curso Taller de LIDERAZGO TRANSFORMACIONAL para la Toma de Decisiones 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/liderazgo-transformacional-2016-2017.html
Consultas al mail: medinacasabella@gmail.com
ó al TE: +5411.3532.0510
.·. Miguel Ángel MEDINA CASABELLA, MSM, MBA, SMHS .·.
Especialista en Management Estratégico, Gestión del Cambio e Inversiones
Representante de The George Washington University en Foros y Ferias de LatAm desde 2001
Representante de The George Washington University Medical Center para los Países de LatAm desde 1996
Ex Director Académico y Profesor de Gestión del Cambio del HSML Program para LatAm en GWU School of Medicine & Health Sciences (Washington DC)
CEO, MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
EMail: medinacasabella@gmail.com
TE Oficina: ( 0054) 11 - 3532 - 0510
TE Móvil (Local): ( 011 ) 15 - 4420 - 5103
TE Móvil (Int´l): ( 0054) 911 - 4420 - 5103
Skype: medinacasabella
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm ©
(medinacasabella@gmail.com; +5411-3532-0510)
es una Consultora Interdisciplinaria cuya Misión es proveer
soluciones integrales, eficientes y operativas en todas las áreas vinculadas a:
Estrategias Multiculturales y Transculturales, Organizacionales y Competitivas,
Management Estratégico,
Gestión del Cambio,
Marketing Estratégico,
Inversiones,
Gestión Educativa,
Capacitación
de Latino América (LatAm), para los Sectores:
a) Salud, Farma y Biotech,
b) Industria y Servicios,
c) Universidades y Centros de Capacitación,
d) Gobierno y ONGs.
No comments:
Post a Comment