What's a Connection Culture, and how do we get
there?
by James daSilva
Culture is a real field of study and real, if
nothing else, in the sense that people believe in it and can perceive good, bad
and nonexistent cultures.
But “culture” used off-hand is vague. It implies
stasis when individual humans are not static. An organization is merely a
collection of individual humans, and so culture is always fluctuating, affected
by internal and external forces, and fragmenting.
This difficulty in moving from the concept to
the murkier reality is possibly why John Traphagan recently warned against the
term “company culture”:
“The problem here is that while we use the term “culture” constantly, most
of us give very little thought to what that term means and how its use
influences behavior and thought within organizations”.
But that leaves us at square one. Perhaps we’d be better to spell out what exactly we mean by culture itself, as well as a “connection culture”.
But that leaves us at square one. Perhaps we’d be better to spell out what exactly we mean by culture itself, as well as a “connection culture”.
- What are the terms, the shared values and the conditions necessary?
- What is the science and research behind these claims?
- What are the proper caveats for the complexity of defining a company culture, building one and maintaining it at scale and over the long term?
- How do we build culture at scale, especially when “culture” is ultimately about many local, social cultures within an organization?
- How do we get started, even if we aren’t the boss?
Michael Lee Stallard, with Jason Pankau and Katharine P. Stallard, makes this effort in the concise yet richly dense “Connection Culture: The Competitive Advantage of Shared Identity, Empathy and Understanding at Work”, released last week by the Association for Talent Development. I recently spoke with him about the book (disclosure: I have a blurb up front praising the book), what a “connection culture” means and what inspired him to write this, his second book.
There’s much, much more in the book, but for
now, here are some highlights of our discussion that hopefully sketch the
journey to the book and what it stands for.
The discovery: What happens when people feel
heard
“Connection Culture” was over a decade in the
making, even though Stallard wrote “Fired Up Or Burned Out” in the meantime.
The first seeds of what such a culture might look like came firsthand, many
years ago, after Stallard had shifted from investment banking to becoming chief
marketing officer at Morgan Stanley’s private wealth management division.
Stallard, new to this business, didn’t assume he
had the answers. He looked to learn indirectly through research and directly by
traveling to various global offices. He showed people at these offices his
thoughts and asked for feedback. Some were suspicious, but others welcomed the
opportunity.
“You just have those truth-tellers who will tell
you what they think,” Stallard said. “And I learned a lot from them. And I also
found that, a number of them who were very enthusiastic. I heard some people
say, ‘Wow, it’s about time someone from New York started asking questions
instead of telling them the answers.'”
Stallard took back that information, with due
credit given, and what happened next? Feedback started coming from those
offices:
“Hey Mike, you know, Goldman Sachs is doing this, I thought you ought to know
about it. Or, we’re seeing this in clients, and we thought this might be
something that’s of interest to you. And it really just created this global
network of intelligence, where these people who were on the front lines were
picking up the phone and just calling me when they had something they thought I
should know about".
Two key insights Stallard learned:
Two key insights Stallard learned:
- These teams wanted access to information and were
finally getting it. This lack of access had not been because of
malicious intent by senior management, but rather a failure to recognize
that such teams “were curious. They
wanted to know.”
- Showing interest in people’s insights reaps
rewards. Stallard recognized he didn’t know this business, and by asking
for advice and giving due credit, he rewarded and
encouraged further help. “It gave them a voice to share what they knew. I
could see they were enthusiastic about that. … And then the cynics started
converting, saying, ‘You know, Mike, he’s one of us. He’s on our side.'”
Simply put, as Stallard phrases it in the book, we’re talking about “shared identity, empathy, and understanding.”
Stallard eventually left Morgan Stanley, armed
with that knowledge plus plus years at other multinational companies and
experience seeing how difficult corporate mergers were in terms of culture.
Burnout does not a good culture (or healthful
person) make
Why did Stallard leave Wall Street? Frankly, he
was burned out. As he recently wrote:
"As my job became more demanding I grew increasingly disconnected from my family. I didn’t feel well. My health began to suffer. I needed a lot of coffee to get me going in the morning and alcohol to slow me down at night. Eventually I left Wall Street to recover and figure out how I drifted so far from who I aspired to become".
On a personal level, Stallard could also sense how culture affected his actions. “At some stages of my careers I was eager to get up in the morning, and the hours flew by, and I didn’t want to stop working,” Stallard said. “And other days I could hardly get out of bed. … I hadn’t changed. It was the culture I was in that was having a positive or negative effect.”
The research-backed health dangers of
disconnection
His initial research then helped him develop
this seed of an idea through the insights of others.
“When people told me [about] when they felt
engaged,” Stallard said, “I just periodically heard the word ‘connection’ or
‘clicked.’ … it was all about this clicking or feeling connected to — ‘this
work feels like I was made to do this.'” From there, he and his research
partners started to drill down into this focus over years.
Over time, he realized, having a sense of
connection means people are less stressed. Connection “makes people feel safe.
It improves their decision-making ability and their creativity because they do
feel safe”, Stallard said. “And when they’re in a culture that’s fast-changing,
it can be threatening. And then people go into a stress response, where their
bodies physiologically start to allocate blood glucose and oxygen to the
‘flight or fight’ systems. … And if they’re stuck in that state all the time
because their culture is not safe, it’s a culture of control or a culture of
indifference to people, then they’re very vulnerable” in their health.
This is also a long-term problem. Overall
health, digestive and immune systems, and ultimately productivity (the
workplace problem) and serious health problems (the personal problem). Scott
Eblin, among others, has written on the mind and body aspect of work.
Notably, Stallard entered his research fearing a
culture of control, but his research taught him that a culture of indifference
was actually worse than (most) cultures of control — no human connections, just
toxicity and loneliness.
What are the values of a connected culture?
So, we know some of the problems. But what is
the fix? Most broadly, Stallard says:
“How do we create a culture where we will be our best, individually and
collectively, so that we’re more creative, we’re better decision makers, we’re
healthier, we’re happier …”
His book chooses six universal needs of humans: respect, recognition, belonging, autonomy, personal growth, and meaning.
His book chooses six universal needs of humans: respect, recognition, belonging, autonomy, personal growth, and meaning.
I asked him specifically about belonging, partly
out of my own interest and because it feels to me like a personal step beyond
respect and recognition and autonomy — the latter three are much more common
phrasings in HR departments.
Belonging can be as
simple as managers caring about employees “not just as means to an end, but
they care about them because they’re people, because they’re breathing,”
Stallard says. “And they hold people in high esteem because they’re human
beings.”
When Paul Spiegelman was at Beryl Cos., he
enacted an online system for employees to alert executives whenever an employee
had some sort of need. As Stallard relates:
“[One employee] broke his glasses in an accident, and so Beryl had his
glasses replaced. And I think Paul actually went and visited him when he was in
the hospital. You know, little things like that … these may not be hugely
expensive things, but they are very heartfelt, genuine beliefs on the part of
the leadership at that company. And the people who work there know it, and they
perform. They feel like a family company”.
Success stories, big, medium and small
Success stories, big, medium and small
Another example meets several of these needs,
yet is incredibly simple: A one-word change in labeling by Pfizer. After a
merger, when the company saw how the other firm called workers “colleagues”
rather than “employees,” Pfizer adopted this practice for the whole company.
“Language is important. And it just sends a
message to the colleagues they work with at Pfizer … that you’re one of us,”
Stallard says.
Beyond that, Stallard says, Pfizer looks to its
managers to develop talent and push that talent outward. People who have not
just autonomy but also real opportunity for personal growth are getting a leg
up, in most cases, on the search for the other universal needs.
Fortunately, you needn’t be a huge corporation
to create a great, connected culture. You needn’t even be at headquarters.
Stallard has recounted the story of Bryan Crawford, who refused to lay off
people at his New Zealand subsidiary in 2008. His alternative plan brought all
employees together, with transparency about the problems and teamwide
involvement in the solutions. It worked so well that his unit nearly quadrupled
in size and their culture lessons are being adopted by the broader
organization. It takes brave action, planning and followup, but it can be done
even if you’re not the boss.
For even smaller companies, it can be more
difficult, Stallard admits. One step is to offer new and different projects to
help blocked employees grow. Another is the famous “20% time” or some variant.
A third option that almost by definition requires a “connected” culture,
Stallard shared, is active mentoring:
“[One CEO] said, ‘Everyone needs a mentor,’ so they identified what
everyone wanted to grow in, and they would pair them with someone who was good
at it. And it created these mentoring relationships where, if I wanted to be a
better speaker … that person would share with me what they do, some things
they’ve learned from their experience. And every year it would change: ‘What do
you want to grow in this year?"
What can you do? Plenty.
All the above examples sound top-down, but HQ
cannot enforce culture. “Recognize that the most important culture is the local
subculture, the people you interact with day in and day out,” Stallard said.
After all, Pfizer could issue a directive and create conditions to ease its
implementation, but it was ultimately up to many people in many places.
Stallard could be open to feedback and communicate with Morgan Stanley
employees as group CMO, but the people at each location also had to buy in.
So, how can we begin?
Chapter 5 of “Connection Culture” offers more
than a dozen steps to help people get started on making “a connection culture
actionable and operational”. These steps require reflection, investigation and
trial and error. They are not simple, but they are not unnecessarily complex or
impossible missions.
This, of course, is easier when you’re in charge
— either the CEO or a department head or some other kind of manager. But, as
Stallard said in our conversation and in the book, each person can build
connections without becoming distracted by what’s not in their control.
Fuente: SmartBrief
Haciendo click en cada uno de los links siguientes, Contenidos de nuestros
TALLERES DE CAPACITACIÓN IN COMPANY, "A MEDIDA"
de las necesidades de su Organización:
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo incorporar y aplicar Modelos de PENSAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO en la Organización? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/pensamiento-estrategico-curso-taller-in.html
- Curso Taller de PLANEAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO - Recetas Eficientes para Escenarios Turbulentos 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/planeamiento-estrategico-curso-taller.html
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo Gerenciar Eficientemente a partir del MANAGEMENT ESTRATÉGICO? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/management-estrategico-curso-taller-in.html
- Curso Taller ¿Cómo GERENCIAR PROCESOS DE CAMBIO y no sufrir en el intento? 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/gestion-del-cambio-2016-2017-curso.html
- Curso Taller de LIDERAZGO TRANSFORMACIONAL para la Toma de Decisiones 2016-2017:
- http://medinacasabella.blogspot.com.ar/2016/04/liderazgo-transformacional-2016-2017.html
Consultas al mail: medinacasabella@gmail.com
ó al TE: +5411.3532.0510
.·. Miguel Ángel MEDINA CASABELLA, MSM, MBA, SMHS .·.
Especialista en Management Estratégico, Gestión del Cambio e Inversiones
Representante de The George Washington University en Foros y Ferias de LatAm desde 2001
Representante de The George Washington University Medical Center para los Países de LatAm desde 1996
Ex Director Académico y Profesor de Gestión del Cambio del HSML Program para LatAm en GWU School of Medicine & Health Sciences (Washington DC)
CEO, MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
EMail: medinacasabella@gmail.com
TE Oficina: ( 0054) 11 - 3532 - 0510
TE Móvil (Local): ( 011 ) 15 - 4420 - 5103
TE Móvil (Int´l): ( 0054) 911 - 4420 - 5103
Skype: medinacasabella
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm ©
(medinacasabella@gmail.com; +5411-3532-0510)
es una Consultora Interdisciplinaria cuya Misión es proveer
soluciones integrales, eficientes y operativas en todas las áreas vinculadas a:
Estrategias Multiculturales y Transculturales, Organizacionales y Competitivas,
Management Estratégico,
Gestión del Cambio,
Marketing Estratégico,
Inversiones,
Gestión Educativa,
Capacitación
de Latino América (LatAm), para los Sectores:
a) Salud, Farma y Biotech,
b) Industria y Servicios,
c) Universidades y Centros de Capacitación,
d) Gobierno y ONGs.
No comments:
Post a Comment