Linkedin & Twitter

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

US Universities: Physical Campus qualities
“impact Retention and Graduation”
by Ellie Bothwell


Scholar says campus environments “matter more than universities realize”. 

US universities with the best physical campus environments tend to have stronger student retention and graduation rates, according to research.

A study looking at the qualities of US campuses found that physical campus characteristics can impact student satisfaction and academic performance.

The research from Amir Hajrasouliha, assistant professor in city and regional planning at California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo, devised a “Campus Score” to measure the “urbanism, greenness and on-campus living” of 103 research-intensive universities in the US.

It examined 10 qualities, which included the proportion of pervious open space; density of tree canopies; proportion of surface parking areas; proportion of students living on campus; campus compactness; diversity of land uses; and the centrality of the campus to its county.
In each case, higher amounts meant higher scores, with the exception of surface parking areas.

The research found that universities with the highest campus scores tended to have a higher proportion of students who stayed at the university after their first year and a higher proportion of students who graduated within six years.

Professor Hajrasouliha said that the research shows that physical campus characteristics “matter more than universities realise”.

“The most common strategies to improve retention and graduation rates are financial- and academic-related strategies, such as revising the financial aid strategy, reregulating student selectivity policy, investing in academic and advisory services, and revising curriculums and programmes. But sometimes we forget that a valuable asset for student success can be the physical campus itself and its surroundings,” he said.

“A supportive learning environment in a physical sense can enrich students’ college experience, create a sense of belonging, and respond to their social and emotional needs.”
Rank
University
Urban score
Green score
Living score
Campus score (composite score)
1
Columbia University
248.84
93.52
216.79
238.25
2
Princeton University
100.17
187.36
223.12
226.66
3
Lehigh University
97.86
219.43
161.89
204.03
4
Duke University
63.93
193.08
191.45
193.20
5
Emory University
69.06
223.07
159.78
191.68
6
Boston University
200.79
89.84
176.67
188.92
7
Stanford University
106.34
126.42
210.45
187.96
8
Yale University
153.21
86.96
202.01
182.08
9
William & Mary
36.62
217.00
172.45
181.83
10
Clarkson University 
15.08
209.99
193.56
181.79
Source: Hajrasouliha, A. (2016) ‘Campus score: measuring university campus qualities’, Landscape and Urban Planning 158, pp 166-176

New York’s Columbia University comes top in terms of its overall campus environment, followed by Princeton University and Lehigh University.

Columbia is the top scorer when it comes to urbanism, while Emory University, which comes fifth overall, is the greenest campus analysed, and Princeton achieves the highest living score.

Private universities, on average, have significantly higher scores in the ranking than public institutions, while universities with greater levels of research activity tended to feature higher up the list.

Campuses built before the American Civil War also did better than newer campuses, mainly because of differences in on-campus living.

In terms of recommendations for universities based on the research, Professor Hajrasouliha suggested that institutions could increase on-campus housing for students and decrease surface parking areas.

For institutions in urban settings, he recommended investing in green spaces on and adjacent to campuses, while he said that encouraging infill and mixed-use development on or adjacent to campuses could lead to improvements for suburban and rural institutions.

 Source: TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION's WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS

Haciendo click en cada uno de los links siguientes, Contenidos de nuestros 
TALLERES DE CAPACITACIÓN IN COMPANY, "A MEDIDA" 
de las necesidades de su Organización:



Consultas al mail: mamc.latam@gmail.com
ó al TE: +5411.3532.0510


.·. Miguel Ángel MEDINA CASABELLA, MSM, MBA, MHSA .·.
Especialista Multicultural Global en Management Estratégico, Conducta Organizacional, Gestión del Cambio e Inversiones, graduado en Haas School of Business (University of California at Berkeley) y The Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania)
Consultor en Dirección Provincial de Educación Superior de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
Miembro del Comité EEUU del Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales
Representante de The George Washington University para LatAm desde 1996
Ex Director Académico y Profesor de Gestión del Cambio del HSML Program para LatAm en GWU School of Medicine & Health Sciences (Washington DC)
CEO, MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
EMail: mamc.latam@gmail.com
TE Oficina: ( 0054) 11 - 3532 - 0510
TE Móvil (Local): ( 011 ) 15 - 4420 - 5103
TE Móvil (Int´l): ( 0054) 911 - 4420 - 5103
Skype: medinacasabella


MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm ©
(mamc.latam@gmail.com; +5411.3532.0510)
es una Consultora Interdisciplinaria cuya Misión es proveer
soluciones integrales, eficientes y operativas en todas las áreas vinculadas a:

Estrategias Multiculturales y Transculturales, Organizacionales y Competitivas,
Management Estratégico,
Gestión del Cambio,
Marketing Estratégico,
Inversiones,
Gestión Educativa,
Capacitación

de Latino América (LatAm), para los Sectores:

a) Industria y Servicios,
b) Universidades y Centros de Capacitación,
c) Gobiernos y ONGs.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)